LucreyaResearch  ›  Apollo.io · AI-Visibility
AI-Visibility report card

Is Apollo.io recommended by AI?

Apollo.io is sometimes recommended by AI. Here is its measured AI-Visibility Score, drawn from 8 live AI engines across our 16-category B2B/GTM audit.

30
/ 100 · #6 of 354
22
times recommended
12
times the #1 pick
2
categories appeared in
7
of 8 engines named it
What this means

Apollo.io makes the short list AI surfaces

When a buyer asks ChatGPT or Google's AI "what's the best tool for this," only a handful of names make the answer. Apollo.io earned an AI-Visibility Score of 30/100, ranking #6 of 354 measured tools. That puts it among the names AI reads aloud at the buying decision.

It was the single top answer 12 times, which is the position that actually gets read aloud when a buyer asks for one recommendation. 7 of 8 engines named it, so it is visible on some assistants and absent from others. Its standing is uneven: #2 in Lead generation but #3 in Sales engagement. A category-level view is the only one that tells a buyer anything.

AI visibility is winnable and separate from Google rankings: the engines we tested disagreed on the #1 tool in most categories, so a product can be invisible to one assistant and a top pick on another. The lever is being named where AI looks, mapped in the cross-engine comparison and the source-bias data.

Competitive position

Where Apollo.io sits against the tools it competes with

Apollo.io appeared in 2 of the 16 categories measured. Each table is that category's full ranked result, so you can see exactly which rivals the engines named ahead of it and which they named behind.

Lead generation · Apollo.io ranks #2 of 8
#ToolWeighted score
1HubSpot10
2Apollo.io (this tool)9.33
3LinkedIn Sales Navigator3.58
4ZoomInfo3.5
5Clearbit1.47
6Leadfeeder1.37
7Marketo1.2
8Seamless.ai1.07
Top pick by engine: Llama 3.3 via Groq chose HubSpot · Cohere Command-A chose HubSpot · Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite chose SyncGTM · Perplexity chose Apollo.io · ChatGPT chose Apollo.io · Llama 4 Scout chose HubSpot · GPT-OSS chose Apollo.io · Qwen 3.6 chose Apollo.io
Sales engagement · Apollo.io ranks #3 of 8
#ToolWeighted score
1Outreach9.58
2HubSpot6.89
3Apollo.io (this tool)6.17
4Salesloft5.2
5Amplemarket2
6Lemlist1.62
7Salesforce1.17
8Reply.io1.05
Top pick by engine: Llama 3.3 via Groq chose HubSpot · Cohere Command-A chose Outreach · Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite chose Amplemarket · Perplexity chose Amplemarket · ChatGPT chose Outreach · Llama 4 Scout chose HubSpot · GPT-OSS chose Outreach · Qwen 3.6 chose Apollo.io

Weighted score is position-weighted recommendation frequency within that category (a #1 mention counts 1.0, a #2 counts 0.5, and so on), summed across every engine and phrasing. It is not a quality judgement.

Want Apollo.io's full per-query breakdown?

See exactly which engines named it, where, and how to raise its AI-Visibility Score.

Run the AI-Visibility checkSee the full study
Method

From the open, CC-BY AI Recommendation Audit: a dated snapshot of what live AI engines recommend, not an endorsement or a quality ranking. Apollo.io appeared in 22 of 1549 recorded recommendations. Open data.

Save
Dashboard